When transformation Calgary rail project is all said and done, it won’t be possible for any politician to come out look good
Published Oct 15, 2024 • Last updated 33 minutes ago • 3 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Article content
It’s been a long time since we’ve been treated to such an unfettered view of politicians trying to save face.
The reason: Calgary’s beleaguered Green Line LRT project.
The players: Pretty much everyone.
When the province decided with no warning in September it was going to walk away from the project because it suddenly expressed a formal objection to spending money on a tunnel through downtown, it should not have been surprised that the result would be the project’s shelving.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account and fewer ads.
Get exclusive access to the Calgary Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Calgary Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
or
Article content
Recall that at the end of July, Calgary city council decided to shrink the Green Line for the umpteeneth time due to cost pressures, paring back the end of the line in southeast Calgary from Shepard to Lynnwood/Millican.
At the time, the province had no real public reservations about what was going on. But suddenly in September, the Government of Alberta decided it had reservations after all.
The province surely must have known its sudden withdrawal from the project, including the loss of its $1.5-billion contribution, would be extremely disruptive given the advanced state of all the work that had already taken place.
As if that wasn’t enough, we learned last week the province’s money was back on the table again, available to fund the portion of the Green Line from 4th Street S.E. in Victoria Park to Shepard.
Calgary Sun Headline News
Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Calgary Sun Headline News will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
While the province seemed to hail this as some kind of victory, it really isn’t.
All last week’s announcement shows is that we could have got to this place without all the tumult and turmoil we’ve been subjected to since the beginning of September.
The newly revived portion of the Green Line is the least problematic and least expensive portion of the project.
The people who were in charge of the Green Line knew this already and as you might recall, the project was split into chunks precisely because of the perceived and real financial risks with the various options for getting the route through downtown. Only more recently was the project sewn back together, ironically in an attempt to obtain cost certainty.
They built off-ramps into the project — which the province didn’t use at the time, as we know.
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
But now here we are well past those off-ramps but still very much off this metaphorical highway, trying to find a way out of the ditch we driven into and get back on the road.
Meanwhile, some voices at the city level continue to discount the possibility of building some kind of elevated track through the city centre before the issue has been properly studied.
Previous objections were mainly related to esthetics and convenience.
Esthetics because some cities have had bad experiences with elevated trains due to poor design choices.
But when built properly, they work.
The main access to Montreal’s Central Station in the heart of downtown is a decades-old viaduct. The parts underneath were smartly repurposed as railway workshops and commercial/office spaces.
Advertisement 5
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
Although Manhattan rid itself of active elevated rail lines, some dense areas on the east side of the East River retain their above-ground sections. Stations are part of the neighbourhood and they work. (I would know: I’ve used them.)
Chicago seems to function just fine with its heritage elevated metro system, which is woven into the city’s fabric and lore.
Meanwhile, large chunks of Berlin’s urban metro and suburban rail use a mix of underground and above-ground services.
As for convenience, the idea of shutting down Plus 15s and rebuilding them is apparently unacceptable, forgetting the fact parts of the walkway network have occasionally closed for months at a time for reconstruction and refurbishment.
Dismissing elevated rail out of hand is counterproductive, and I’m not certain this alternative ever got a fair hearing.
Advertisement 6
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
To not entertain an elevated option for the Green Line given the current circumstances is tantamount to obstruction.
Whatever happens now, we are well beyond the place where politicians can gloat about the Green Line if and when it ever gets completed. They were the ones who ruined it in the first place, so getting things back on track will hardly be deserving of praise.
Elected officials simply need to put their heads down and work. It’s too late to save face.
rleong@postmedia.com
Recommended from Editorial
How the Green Line went from foundational project to multibillion-dollar bust